Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

The phylogeny of land plants: A cladistic analysis based on male gametogenesis

David J. Garbary1, Karen S. Renzaglia2 and Jeffrey G. Duckett3

(1) Department of Biology, St. Francis Xavier University, B2G 1C0 Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada
(2) Department of Biological Sciences, East Tennessee State University, 37614 Johnson City, Tennessee, USA
(3) School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Mile End Road, E1 4NS London, U.K.

Received: 27 January 1993  Accepted: 26 March 1993  

Abstract  A cladistic analysis was carried out to resolve phylogenetic pattern among bryophytes and other land plants. The analysis used 22 taxa of land plants and 90 characters relating to male gametogenesis.Coleochaete orChara/Nitella were the outgroups in various analyses using HENNIG86, PAUP, and MacClade, and the land plant phylogeny was unchanged regardless of outgroup utilized. The most parsimonious cladograms from HENNIG86 (7 trees) have treelengths of 243 (C.I. = 0.58, R.I. = 0.82). Bryophytes are monophyletic as are hornworts, liverworts, and mosses, with hornworts identified as the sister group of a liverwort/moss assemblage. In vascular plants, lycophytes are polyphyletic andSelaginella is close to the bryophytes.Lycopodium is the sister group of the remaining vascular plants (minusSelaginella). Longer treelengths (over 250) are required to produce tree topologies in which either lycophytes are monophyletic or to reconstruct the paraphyletic bryophyte phylogeny of recent authors. This analysis challenges existing concepts of bryophyte phylogeny based on more classical data and interpretations, and provides new insight into land plant evolution.

Key words  Bryophytes - ferns - gymnosperms - seed plants - land plants - Antheridia - cladistics - gametogenesis - phylogeny - spermatogenesis


Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
Image of the first page of the fulltext

References secured to subscribers.



Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Referenced by
18 newer articles

  1. Crandall-Stotler, B. (2009) PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MARCHANTIOPHYTA. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 66(1)
    [CrossRef]
  2. KENRICK, ByPAUL (1994) ALTERNATION OF GENERATIONS IN LAND PLANTS: NEW PHYLOGENETIC AND PALAEOBOTANICAL EVIDENCE. Biological Reviews 69(3)
    [CrossRef]
  3. Troitsky, A. V. (2007) Contribution of genosystematics to current concepts of phylogeny and classification of bryophytes. Biochemistry (Moscow) 72(12)
    [CrossRef]
  4. Renzaglia, Karen S. (1999) Developmental Ultrastructure of the Male Gamete of Selaginella. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160(1)
    [CrossRef]
  5. Pryer, Kathleen M. (1999) Phylogeny of Marsileaceous Ferns and Relationships of the Fossil Hydropteris pinnata Reconsidered. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160(5)
    [CrossRef]
  6. Qiu, Yin‐Long (2007) A Nonflowering Land Plant Phylogeny Inferred from Nucleotide Sequences of Seven Chloroplast, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Genes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168(5)
    [CrossRef]
  7. Graham, Linda E. (1996) Green algae to land plants: An evolutionary transition. Journal of Plant Research 109(3)
    [CrossRef]
  8. Morbelli, Marta A. (1996) Application of confocal microscopy to exospore ultrastructure in megaspores ofSelaginella convoluta andS. marginata. Journal of Plant Research 109(1)
    [CrossRef]
  9. He-Nygren, Xiaolan (2006) Illuminating the evolutionary history of liverworts (Marchantiophyta)-towards a natural classification. Cladistics 22(1)
    [CrossRef]
  10. Renzaglia, K. S. (2002) Novel features of Equisetum arvense spermatozoids: insights into pteridophyte evolution. New Phytologist 154(1)
    [CrossRef]
First | Next | Last
Remote Address: 38.107.191.103 • Server: mpweb20
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)