Published in partnership with the

Logo

Interest in the Use of Computerized Patient Portals: Role of the Provider–Patient Relationship

Susan L. Zickmund, Rachel Hess, Cindy L. Bryce, Kathleen McTigue, Ellen Olshansky, Katharine Fitzgerald and Gary S. Fischer

From the issue entitled "New Medical Technologies: The Potential and Pitfalls of Innovation, Guest Editors: Jeffrey A. Tice, MD, Mitchell D. Feldman, MD, MPhil, Deputy Editors: Richard M. Hoffman, MD, MPH, Claudia A. Steiner, MD, MPH"

View Related Documents

Abstract

Background  

Bioinformatics experts are developing interactive patient portals to help those living with diabetes and other chronic diseases to better manage their conditions. However, little is known about what influences patients’ desires to use this technology.

Objective  

To discern the impact of the provider–patient relationship on interest in using a web-based patient portal.

Design  

Qualitative analysis of focus groups.

Participants  

Ten focus groups involving 39 patients (range 2–7) recruited from four primary care practices.

Approach  

A qualitative approach was used, which involved reading transcribed texts until a consensus was reached on data interpretation. An intercoder reliability kappa score (0.89) was determined by comparing the provider–patient relationship talk selected by the two coders. A conceptual framework was developed, which involved the development and refinement of a codebook and the application of it to the transcripts.

Results  

Interest in the portal was linked to dissatisfaction with the provider–patient relationship, including dissatisfaction with provider communication/responsiveness, the inability to obtain medical information, and logistical problems with the office. Disinterest in the portal was linked to satisfaction with the provider–patient relationship, including provider communication/responsiveness, difficulty in using the portal, and fear of losing relationships and e-mail contact with the provider. No patient identified encrypted e-mail communication through the portal as an advantage.

Conclusions  

Promoting the use of computerized portals requires patient-based adaptations. These should include ease of use, direct provider e-mail, and reassurances that access and interpersonal relationships will not be lost. Education is needed about privacy concerns regarding traditional e-mail communication.

KEY WORDS  patient portal - bioinformatics - provider–patient communication - diabetes - e-mail communication

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document