Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

Preemptive Reification

Steven R. NewcombContact Information

(6)  Coolheads Consulting, 1527 Northaven Drive Allen, Texas, 75002, USA
Abstract
It is useful to express the location of a node in a semantic graph in terms of a sequence of knowledge-bearing arcs that lead to the node from a node that is used as a point of reference. If the arcs on which such “graph-based addressing expressions” depend disappear, the expressions become invalid.
When an arc is reified as a node, the reified arc may or may not be removed. If it is not removed, the semantic graph may exhibit unnecessary complexity, ambiguity, and lack of parsimony. Alternatively, if the original arc is removed, the value of dependent graph-based addressing expressions may be lost.
For systems intended to support collaborative knowledge aggregation, such as the Semantic Web, one way to resolve this dilemma is to disallow “lazy” reification, and, in effect, preemptively reify everything that may, at any future time, require reification. Preemptively reified nodes can be “virtual” until they are actually needed, thus effectively maintaining parsimony.
The Reference Model of the Topic Maps paradigm, now under development in the ISO, shows how the need for “lazy” reification can be avoided by means of a fixed set of arc types and rules used to represent fully elaborated assertions.

Contact Information Steven R. Newcomb
Email: srn@coolheads.com
URL: http://www.coolheads.com
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
Image of the first page of the fulltext


Export this chapter
Export this chapter as RIS | Text
 
Remote Address: 38.107.191.106 • Server: mpweb16
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)