Volume 53, Number 1, 36-44, DOI: 10.1007/s00125-009-1569-3

Published in partnership with the

Logo

European Association for the Study of Diabetes

Hyperglycaemic clamp test for diabetes risk assessment in IA-2-antibody-positive relatives of type 1 diabetic patients

E. Vandemeulebroucke, B. Keymeulen, K. Decochez, I. Weets, C. De Block, F. Féry, U. Van de Velde, I. Vermeulen, P. De Pauw and C. Mathieu, et al.

View Related Documents

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis  

The aim of the study was to investigate the use of hyperglycaemic clamp tests to identify individuals who will develop diabetes among insulinoma-associated protein-2 antibody (IA-2A)-positive first-degree relatives (IA-2A+ FDRs) of type 1 diabetic patients.

Methods  

Hyperglycaemic clamps were performed in 17 non-diabetic IA-2A+ FDRs aged 14 to 33 years and in 21 matched healthy volunteers (HVs). Insulin and C-peptide responses were measured during the first (5–10 min) and second (120–150 min) release phase, and after glucagon injection (150–160 min). Clamp-induced C-peptide release was compared with C-peptide release during OGTT.

Results  

Seven (41%) FDRs developed diabetes 3–63 months after their initial clamp test. In all phases they had lower C-peptide responses than non-progressors (p < 0.05) and HVs (p < 0.002). All five FDRs with low first-phase release also had low second-phase release and developed diabetes 3–21 months later. Two of seven FDRs with normal first-phase but low second-phase release developed diabetes after 34 and 63 months, respectively. None of the five FDRs with normal C-peptide responses in all test phases has developed diabetes so far (follow-up 56 to 99 months). OGTT-induced C-peptide release also tended to be lower in progressors than in non-progressors or HVs, but there was less overlap in results between progressors and the other groups using the clamp.

Conclusions/interpretation  

Clamp-derived functional variables stratify risk of diabetes in IA-2A+ FDRs and may more consistently identify progressors than OGTT-derived variables. A low first-phase C-peptide response specifically predicts impending diabetes while a low second-phase response may reflect an earlier disease stage.

Trial registration:  

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00654121

Funding:  

The insulin trial was financially supported by Novo Nordisk Pharma nv.

Keywords  Beta cell function - C-peptide - Hyperglycaemic clamp test - IA-2 antibodies - Insulin - Prediction - Prevention - Type 1 diabetes

The Diabetes Research Center, Brussels, and the Department of Endocrinology, Leuven, are partners of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Center for Beta Cell Therapy in Diabetes.

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document