Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

Impact of doubled CO2 on the interaction between the global and regional water cycles in four study regions

Zhao Li1, Uma S. Bhatt1 and Nicole MöldersContact Information

(1)  Geophysical Institute and College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Atmospheric Science Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Drive, P.O. Box 757320, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USA

Received: 5 February 2007  Accepted: 25 May 2007  Published online: 19 July 2007

Abstract  Results from a suite of 30-year simulations (after spin-up) of the fully coupled Community Climate System Model version 2.0.1 are analyzed to examine the impact of doubling CO2 on interactions between the global water cycle and the regional water cycles of four similar-size, but hydrologically and thermally different study regions (the Yukon, Ob, St Lawrence, and Colorado river basins and their adjacent land). A heuristic evaluation based on published climatological data shows that the model generally produces acceptable results for the control 1× CO2 concentration, except for mountainous regions where it performs like other modern climate models. After doubling CO2, the Northern Hemisphere receives significantly (95% confidence level) more moisture from the Southern Hemisphere during the boreal summer than under 1× CO2 conditions, and the phase of the annual cycle of net moisture transport to areas north of 60°N shifts to a month later than in the reference simulation. Precipitation and evapotranspiration in the doubled CO2 simulation increase for the Yukon, Ob, and St Lawrence, but decrease, on average, for the Colorado region compared to the reference simulation. For all regions, interaction between global and regional water cycles increases under doubled CO2, because the amount of moisture entering and leaving the regions increases in the warmer climate. The degree of change in this interaction depends on region and season, and is related to slight shifts in the position/strength of semi-permanent highs and lows for the Yukon, Ob, and St Lawrence; in the Colorado region, higher temperatures associated with doubling CO2 and the anticyclone located over the region increase the persistence of dry conditions.

Contact Information Nicole Mölders
Email: molders@gi.alaska.edu

References

AchutaRao K, Covey C, Doutriaux C, Fionino M, Gleckler P, Philips T, Sperber K, Taylor K, Bader D (eds) (2004) An appraisal of coupled climate model simulations. Tech Rep UCRL-TR-202550, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore. http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/model_appraisal.pdf, pp 28–31
 
Baumgartner A, Reichel E (1975) The world water balance. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 179
 
Blackmon M, Boville B, Bryan F, Dickinson R, Gent P, Kiehl J, Moritz R, Randall D, Shukla J, Solomon S, Bonan G, Doney S, Fung I, Hack J, Hunke E, Hurrell J, Kutzbach J, Meehl J, Otto-Bliesner B, Saravanan R, Schneider EK, Sloan L, Spall M, Taylor K, Tribbia J, Washington W (2001) The Community Climate System Model. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82:2357–2376
CrossRef
 
Bonan GB (1998) The land surface climatology of the NCAR land surface model coupled to the NCAR community climate model. J Clim 11:1307–1326
CrossRef
 
Bonan GB, Oleson KW, Vertenstein M, Levis S, Zeng X, Dai Y, Dickinson RE, Yang ZL (2002) The land surface climatology of the Community Land Model coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. J Clim 15:3123–3149
CrossRef
 
Briegleb BP, Hunke EC, Bitz CM, Lipscomb WH, Holland MM, Schramm JL, Moritz RE (2004) The sea ice simulation of the Community Climate System Model, version two. NCAR Technical Note. NCAR TN-45+STR, p 34
 
Broecker WS (1997) Thermohaline circulation, the Achilles heel of our climate system: will man-made CO2 upset the current balance? Science 278:1582–1588
CrossRef
 
Colle BA, Mass CF, Westrick KJ (2000) MM5 precipitation verification over the Pacific Northwest during the 1997–99 cool seasons. Wea Forecasting 15:730–744
CrossRef
 
Coquard J, Duffy PB, Taylor KE, Iorio JP (2004) Present and future surface climate in the western USA as simulated by 15 global climate models. Clim Dyn 23:455–472
SpringerLink
 
Covey C, AchutaRao KM, Cubasch U, Jones P, Lambert SJ, Mann ME, Phillips TJ, Taylor KE (2003) An overview of results from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. Global Planet Change 37:103–133
CrossRef
 
Croley TE II, Quinn FH, Kunkel KE, Changnon SA (1998) Great Lakes hydrology under transposed climates. Clim Change 38:405–433
SpringerLink
 
Cubasch U, Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Stouffer RJ, Dix M, Noda A, Senior CA, Raper S, Yap KS (2001) Projections of future climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working Group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 881
 
Dai A, Trenberth KE (2004) The diurnal cycle and its depiction in the community climate system model. J Clim 17:930–951
CrossRef
 
Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickenson RE, Backer I, Bonan GB, Bosilovich MG, Denning AS, Dirmeyer PA, Houser PR, Niu G, Oleson KW, Schlosser CA, Yang ZL (2003) The Common Land Model. Bull Am Met Soc 84:1013–1023
CrossRef
 
Dingman SL (1994) Physical hydrology. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, p 575
 
Eltahir EAB, Bras RL (1996) Precipitation recycling. Rev Geophys 34:367–378
CrossRef
 
Flato GM, Boer GJ, Lee WG, McFarlane NA, Ramsden D, Reader MC, Weaver AJ (2000) The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis global coupled model and its climate. Clim Dyn 16:451–467
SpringerLink
 
Folland CK, Rayner NA, Brown SJ, Smith TM, Shen SS, Parker DE, Macadam I, Jones PD, Jones NR, Nicholls N, Sexton DMH (2001) Global temperature change and its uncertainties since 1861. Geophys Res Lett 28:2621–2624
CrossRef
 
Førland EJ, Hassen-Bauer I (2000) Increased precipitation in the Norwegian Arctic: true or false? Clim Change 46:485–509
SpringerLink
 
Frei C, Schär C (1998) A precipitation climatology of the Alps from high-resolution rain-gauge observations. Int J Climatol 18:873–900
CrossRef
 
Furevik T, Bentsen M, Drange H, Kindem IKT, Kvamstø NG, Sorteberg A (2003) Description and evaluation of the Bergen climate model: ARPEGE coupled with MICOM. Clim Dyn 21:27–51
SpringerLink
 
Giorgi F, Hewitson B, Christensen JH, Hulme M, von Storch H, Whetton P, Jones RG, Mearns LO, Fu C (2001) Regional climate information evaluation and projections. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Xiaoxu D (eds) Chapter 10, Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis, contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 583–638
 
Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process. Wiley, New York, p 456
 
Hack J (1994) Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM2). J Geophys Res 99:5551–5568
 
Hennessy KJ, Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB (1997) Changes in daily precipitation under enhanced greenhouse conditions. Clim Dyn 13:667–680
SpringerLink
 
Hinkel KM, Nelson FE, Klene AE, Bell JH (2003) The urban heat island in winter at Barrow, Alaska. Int J Climatol 23:1889–1905
CrossRef
 
Holland MM (2003) The north Atlantic oscillation-Arctic oscillation in the CCSM2 and its influence on Arctic climate variability. J Clim 16:2767–2781
CrossRef
 
Holland MM, Bitz CM, Hunke EC, Lipscomb WH, Schramm JL (2006) Influence of the sea ice thickness distribution on polar climate in CCSM3. J Clim 19:2398–2414
CrossRef
 
Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 36–40
 
Hulme M, Osborn TJ, Johns TC (1998) Precipitation sensitivity to global warming: comparison of observations with HadCM2 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 25:3379–3382
CrossRef
 
Johns TC, Carnell RE, Crossley JF, Gregory JM, Mitchell JFB, Senior CA, Tett SFB, Wood RA (1997) The second Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere GCM: model description, spinup and validation. Clim Dyn 13:103–134
SpringerLink
 
Jones PD, Hulme M (1996) Calculating regional climatic time series for temperature and precipitation: methods and illustrations. Int J Climatol 16:361–377
CrossRef
 
Kiehl JT, Gent PR (2004) The Community Climate System Model, version 2. J Clim 17:3666–3682
CrossRef
 
Larson LW, Peck EL (1974) Accuracy of precipitation measurements for hydrologic modeling. Water Resource Res 10:857–863
 
Mahfouf JF, Cariolle D, Royer JF, Geleyn JF, Timbal B (1994) Response of the MÉTÉO-FRANCE climate model to changes in CO2 and sea surface temperature. Clim Dyn 9:345–362
SpringerLink
 
Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Covey C, Latif M, Stouffer RJ (2000) The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Bull Am Met Soc 81:313–318
CrossRef
 
Milly PCD (1991) Potential evaporation and soil moisture in general circulation models. J Clim 5:209–226
CrossRef
 
Narapusetty B, Mölders N (2005) Evaluation of snow depth and soil temperatures predicted by the hydro-thermodynamic soil-vegetation scheme coupled with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-NCAR mesoscale model. J App Met 44:1827–1843
CrossRef
 
National Climatic Data Center (1987) Monthly climatic data for the world, vol 40, nos. 1 and 7. NOAA, NCDC, Asheville
 
Oliver JE, Fairbridge RW (1987) The encyclopedia of climatology. Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York, p 500
 
Peterson TC, Vose RS (1997) An overview of the global historical climatology network temperature data base. Bull Am Met Soc 78:2837–2849
CrossRef
 
Rasch PJ, Kristjánsson JE (1998) A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations. J Clim 11:1587–1614
CrossRef
 
Smith RD, Dukowicz JK, Malone RC (1992) Parallel ocean general circulation modeling. Physica D 60:38–61
CrossRef
 
Su F, Adam JC, Trenberth KE, Lettenmaier DP (2006) Evaluation of surface water fluxes of the pan-Arctic land region with a land surface model and ERA-40 reanalysis. J Geophys Res 111:D05110. doi:10.1029/2005JD006387
CrossRef
 
Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, da Costa Bechthold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Anderson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosvac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Morcette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart J Meterol Soc 131:2961–3011
CrossRef
 
Wang M, Liu Q, Yang X (2004) A review of research of human activity induced climate change. I. Greenhouse gases and aerosols. Adv Atmos Sci 21:314–321
SpringerLink
 
Yang D, Goodison BE, Metcalfe JR, Golubev VS, Bates R, Pangburn T, Hanson CL (1998) Accuracy of NWS 8” standard nonrecording precipitation gauge: results and application of WMO intercomparison. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:54–68
CrossRef
 
Yang D, Woo MK (1999) Representativeness of local snow data for large scale hydrologic investigations. Hydrol Process 13:1977–1988
CrossRef
 
Zhang GJ, McFarlane NA (1995) Role of convective scale momentum transport in climate simulation. J Geophys Res 100:1417–1426
CrossRef
 
Zhang GJ, Kiehl JT, Rache PJ (1998) Response of climate simulation to a new convective parameterization in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM3). J Clim 11:2097–2115
 
Zhang MH, Lin W, Bretherton CS, Hack JJ, Rasch PJ (2003) A modified formulation of fractional stratiform condensation rate in the NCAR community atmospheric model CAM2. J Geophys Res 108(D1):4035. doi:10.1029/2002JD002523
CrossRef
 
Zhong S, In HJ, Bian X, Charney J, Heilman W, Potter B (2005) Evaluation of real-time high-resolution MM5 predictions over the Great Lakes region. Mon Wea Rev 20:63–81
 


Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Referenced by
1 newer article

  1. PaiMazumder, Debasish (2009) Theoretical Assessment of Uncertainty in Regional Averages due to Network Density and Design. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 48(8)
    [CrossRef]
Remote Address: 38.107.191.102 • Server: MPWEB26
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)