Volume 7, Numbers 1-2, 69-73, DOI: 10.1007/s10805-009-9084-1

Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference

Francis Rolleston, Jack Corman, Serge Gauthier, Paddi O’Hara and Rod Schmaltz

From the issue entitled "Special Issue: Transitions: The Changing Landscape of Human Participant Protection Selected Proceeding from the 2009 Conference of the National Council on Ethics in Human Research Varia: Selected papers from the NCEHR Conference on Research Ethics in the Context of Sectoral Violence"

View Related Documents

Abstract

Research Ethics Boards (REBs) provide oversight for Canadians that research projects will comply with standards of ethics if the studies are carried out as described in the documents that have been approved. While REBs have traditionally been affiliated with institutions such as universities and hospitals, a number of factors - including the increased volume of research being conducted outside academic centres - have resulted in the establishment of some private or independent REBs. This, in turn, has raised concerns about the credibility of REBs in the private sector and their capacity to handle issues around conflict of interest. This Breakout Session was an opportunity to hear the perspectives of people associated with institutional and private REBs and examine perceived problems with boards in the private sector, scrutinize theoretical and structural differences between types of REBs, and look at whether or not there is room for both institutional and private boards in the Canadian research review landscape.

Keywords  Research Ethics Board - Institutional Review Board - Private sector review - Conflict of interest

Fulltext Preview

Image of the first page of the fulltext document