Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
A Unified Framework for Indexing and Matching Hierarchical Shape Structures
| Book Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin / Heidelberg |
| ISSN | 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online) |
| Volume | Volume 2059/2001 |
| Book | Visual Form 2001 |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45129-3 |
| Copyright | 2001 |
| ISBN | 978-3-540-42120-7 |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45129-3_6 |
| Pages | 67-84 |
| Subject Collection | Computer Science |
| SpringerLink Date | Monday, January 01, 2001 |
| |
|
A Unified Framework for Indexing and Matching Hierarchical Shape Structures
Ali Shokoufandeh6 and Sven Dickinson7
| (6) |
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA USA, 19104-2875 |
| (7) |
Department of Computer Science, 6 King’s College Rd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3G4 |
Abstract
Hierarchical image structures are abundant in computer vision, and have been used to encode part structure, scale spaces,
and a variety of multiresolution features. In this paper, we describe a unified framework for both indexing and matching such
structures. First, we describe an indexing mechanism that maps the topological structure of a directed acyclic graph (DAG)
into a low-dimensional vector space. Based on a novel eigenvalue characterization of a DAG, this topological signature allows
us to efficiently retrieve a small set of candidates from a database of models. To accommodate occlusion and local deformation,
local evidence is accumulated in each of the DAG’s topological subspaces. Given a small set of candidate models, we will next
describe a matching algorithm that exploits this same topological signature to compute, in the presence of noise and occlusion,
the largest isomorphic subgraph between the image structure and the candidate model structure which, in turn, yields a measure
of similarity which can be used to rank the candidates. We demonstrate the approach with a series of indexing and matching
experiments in the domains of 2-D and (view-based) 3-D generic object recognition.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|