Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Endoscopic Appearance of the Minor Papilla Predicts Findings at Pancreatography
| Journal | Digestive Diseases and Sciences |
| Publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| ISSN | 0163-2116 (Print) 1573-2568 (Online) |
| Category | Original Article |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10620-009-1025-8 |
| Subject Collection | Medicine |
| SpringerLink Date | Wednesday, November 18, 2009 |
| |
 |
Original Article
Endoscopic Appearance of the Minor Papilla Predicts Findings at Pancreatography
Christopher Lawrence1 , Andreas M. Stefan2 and Douglas A. Howell2
| (1) |
Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, ART 7100A, Charleston, SC 29425-2900, USA |
| (2) |
Portland Gastroenterology Center, 1200 Congress St., Suite 300, Portland, ME 04102, USA |
Received: 15 July 2009 Accepted: 7 October 2009 Published online: 29 October 2009
Abstract
Background The minor papilla serves as a site of alternative pancreatic duct drainage via the accessory pancreatic duct.
Aims The objectives of this study were to assess the endoscopic appearance of the minor papilla for characteristics that might
predict increased accessory pancreatic duct flow and hence suggest pathology of the downstream pancreatic ductal system.
Methods This was a nonrandomized, prospective analysis of consecutively enrolled patients from a tertiary care medical center (Maine
Medical Center, Portland, Maine). The study cohort consisted of consecutive patients presenting for endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) without prior pancreaticobiliary endotherapy or ductography.
Results Sixty-four patients received a minor papilla score prior to ERCP. A normal pancreatogram was found in 37 of 64 (57.8%) patients;
the remaining 27 (42.2%) patients had an abnormal pancreatogram. The median minor papilla bulge score was 0.49 (range 0–3)
in the normal pancreatogram group and 2 (range 0–3) in the abnormal pancreatogram group ( P < 0.0001). The median minor papilla orifice score of those with a normal pancreatogram was 0 (range 0–2) compared to 2 (range
0–3) in the abnormal pancreatogram group ( P < 0.001). The median minor papilla cumulative score of 1 (range 0–5) for the normal pancreatogram group was significantly
less than that for the abnormal pancreatogram group (3, range 0–6, P < 0.0001), resulting in a sensitivity of 96.3% for an abnormal pancreatogram. The minor papilla orifice was noted to be either
gaping or actively dripping pancreatic juice in four out of five patients with pancreas divisum.
Conclusions A minor papilla without bulging or a visible orifice would suggest a normal pancreatogram at ERP. Conversely, an abnormal
minor papilla, particularly a patent minor papilla orifice, should raise suspicion of pancreatic ductal pathology and can
help direct pancreatic endotherapy at the major or minor papillae.
Keywords Minor papilla - ERCP - Endoscopy - Pancreatic duct
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|