Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
My Menu
Saved Items

GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE

B. Tapley1, J. RiesContact Information, S. Bettadpur1, D. Chambers1, M. Cheng1, F. Condi1, B. Gunter1, Z. Kang1, P. Nagel1, R. Pastor1, T. Pekker1, S. Poole1 and F. Wang1

(1)  Center for Space Research, The University of Texas, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200, Austin, Texas 78759, USA

Received: 24 December 2004  Accepted: 21 June 2005  Published online: 16 September 2005

Abstract  A new generation of Earth gravity field models called GGM02 are derived using approximately 14 months of data spanning from April 2002 to December 2003 from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE). Relative to the preceding generation, GGM01, there have been improvements to the data products, the gravity estimation methods and the background models. Based on the calibrated covariances, GGM02 (both the GRACE-only model GGM02S and the combination model GGM02C) represents an improvement greater than a factor of two over the previous GGM01 models. Error estimates indicate a cumulative error less than 1 cm geoid height to spherical harmonic degree 70, which can be said to have met the GRACE minimum mission goals.
Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z

Keywords  GRACE - Geopotential - Geoid - Global gravity field modeling


Contact Information J. Ries
Email: ries@csr.utexas.edu
Phone: +1-512-4717486
Fax: +1-512-4713570
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
Image of the first page of the fulltext
Supplemental Material


Export this article
Export this article as RIS | Text
 
Referenced by
68 newer articles

  1. Carminati, Eugenio (2010) North Atlantic geoid high, volcanism and glaciations. Geophysical Research Letters 37(3)
    [CrossRef]
  2. Rowlands, D. D. (2010) Global mass flux solutions from GRACE: A comparison of parameter estimation strategies—Mass concentrations versus Stokes coefficients. Journal of Geophysical Research 115(b1)
    [CrossRef]
  3. Kisiel, A. (2009) Efficient and robust calculation of femtoscopic correlation functions in spherical harmonics directly from the raw pairs measured in heavy-ion collisions. Physical Review C 80(6)
    [CrossRef]
  4. Eshagh, Mehdi (2009) Least-Squares Modification of Stokes' Formula with EGM08. Geodesy and Cartography 35(4)
    [CrossRef]
  5. Pritchard, D. (2009) Uplift histories from river profiles. Geophysical Research Letters 36(24)
    [CrossRef]
  6. Eshagh, M.Abdollahzadeh, M.Najafi-Alamdari, M. (2008) Simplification of Geopotential Perturbing Force Acting on A Satellite. Artificial Satellites 43(2)
    [CrossRef]
  7. Eshagh, M. (2008) The Effect of Polar Gaps on the Solutions of Gradiometric Boundary Value Problems. Artificial Satellites 43(3)
    [CrossRef]
  8. Erol, Bihter (2009) Comparison of global geopotential models from the champ and grace missions for regional geoid modelling in Turkey. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 53(4)
    [CrossRef]
  9. Hwang, Cheinway (2008) . IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46(11)
    [CrossRef]
  10. Ozyavas, Aziz (2008) . IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 5(4)
    [CrossRef]
First | Next | Last
Remote Address: 38.107.191.114 • Server: mpweb07
HTTP User Agent: CCBot/1.0 (+http://www.commoncrawl.org/bot.html)