Remotely operated vehicle (ROV)-based field studies on the distribution and behaviour of
Periphylla periphylla Péron and Lesueur (Ann Mus Hist Nat Marseille 14:316–366, 1809), from three Norwegian fjords have been combined with on-board
experiments and morphological and histological studies in order to understand the trophic ecology of this species. Field studies
from one of the fjords showed that the zooplankton biomass was negatively related with
P. periphylla abundance, indicating a predatory effect. The majority of zooplankton biomass tended to be distributed above the aggregation
of
P. periphylla, which in turn showed highest abundance at 100–200 m depth. Observation on the orientation of medusae passing the ROV when
descending down in the water column at dawn and dusk, showed no consistency with the theory of diel vertical migration. Estimated
metabolic demand of
P. periphylla indicated a daily predation impact on the prey assemblage of 13% as an average for the fjord. In situ behavioural observations
showed that the dominant tentacle posture of large medusae was straight upward, with tentacles extended to the oral–aboral
body axis. The hunting mode alternates between ambush and ramming, whereby tentacle posture minimises the water turbulence
that may otherwise alarm the prey. The musculature of the tentacles is well developed, with an especially strong longitudinal
muscle on the oral side, facilitating fast movement of the tentacle towards the mouth. In addition, ring-, radial-, and diagonal
musculatures are also present. The diagonal is probably most important for the corkscrew retraction of the tentacle, used
at the moment of prey capture. Results from laboratory experiments show that different body-parts of
P. periphylla vary in sensitivity for chemical and mechanical stimuli, including hydrodynamic disturbance and vibration in the surrounding
water. Feeding success is facilitated by combining the vibration-sense on the tentacle tips and the marginal lappets, the
touch-sense on the tentacle bases and marginal lappets, and a taste control of the captured prey at the mouthlips.
Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe