Background
Clinician perceptions of a newly implemented electronic health record play an important role in its success or failure.
Objective
To measure changes in primary care clinician attitudes toward an electronic health record during the first year following
implementation.
Design
Longitudinal survey.
Participants
86 primary care clinicians surveyed between December 2006 and January 2008.
Measurements
Perceived impact on overall quality of care, patient safety, communication, and efficiency at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following
implementation.
Results
Response rates for months 1, 3, 6, and 12 were 92%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. The proportion of clinicians agreeing
that the EHR improved the overall quality of care (63% to 86%; p < 0.001), reduced medication-related errors (72% to 81%;
p = 0.03), improved follow-up of test results (62% to 87%; p < 0.001), and improved communication among clinicians (72% to
93%; p < 0.001) increased from month 1 to month 12. During the same time period, a decreasing proportion of clinicians agreed
that the EHR reduced the quality of patient interactions (49% to 33%; p = 0.001), resulted in longer patient visits (68% to
51%; p = 0.001), and increased time spent on medical documentation (78% to 68%; p = 0.006). Significant improvements in perceptions
related to test result follow-up were first detected at 6 months, while those related to overall quality, efficiency, and
communication were first identified at 12 months.
Conclusions
Primary care clinicians report increasingly positive perceptions of a new electronic health record within 1 year of implementation
across a spectrum of domains of care.
KEY WORDS quality improvement - electronic medical record - electronic health record - health information technology
This study was funded by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1 R01 HS 015226-01) and the National
Library of Medicine (2 T15 LM 07092-16).