Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
An Extension of BDICTL with Functional Dependencies and Components
| |
|
An Extension of BDI CTL with Functional Dependencies and Components
Mehdi Dastani3 and Leendert van der Torre4 
| (3) |
Institute of Information and Computer Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands |
| (4) |
Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
Abstract
This paper discusses the formal specification of properties that determine the behavior of component based BDI agents, i.e.
classical BDI agents in which the mental attitudes are conditional and represented by interconnected components. Some properties,
such as realism and commitment strategies, have already been discussed in the BDI literature and can be formally specified
by for example Rao and Georgeff’s BDIctl formalism. Other properties are specific to component based cognitive agents and cannot be specified by existing BDIctl formalisms. We focus here on the so-called functional dependencies between mental attitudes where a mental attitude is considered
to be a function of one or more other mental attitudes. To formally specify the properties of functional dependencies we extend
Rao and Georgeff’s BDIctl formalism. In particular, for functional dependencies we introduce ‘only belief’, ‘only desire’and ‘only intend’ operators
in the tradition of Levesque’s ‘all I know’ operator, and for components we distinguish between ‘belief in’and ‘belief out’,
‘desire in’and ‘desire out’, and ‘intention in’ and ‘intention out’ operators. We show how our extended formalism can be used
to specify functionality properties such as conservativity, monotonic ity, and self-boundedness, as well as properties related
to the connections between and control of the components.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|