This paper considers the problem of estimating a normal mean from the point of view of the estimation after preliminary test
of significance. But our point of view is different from the usual one. The difference is interpretation about a null hypothesis.
Let
[`(X)]\bar X
denote the sample mean based on a sample of size
n from a normal population with unknown mean μ and known variance
σ
2. We consider the estimator that assumes the value
w[`(X)]\omega \bar X
when
| [`(X)] | < Cs \mathord \vphantom < Cs Ön Ön \left| {\bar X} \right|{{< C\sigma } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{< C\sigma } {\sqrt n }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sqrt n }}
and the value
[`(X)]\bar X
when
| [`(X)] | \geqq Cs \mathord \vphantom \geqq Cs Ön Ön \left| {\bar X} \right|{{ \geqq C\sigma } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ \geqq C\sigma } {\sqrt n }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sqrt n }}
where ω is a real number such that 0≤ω≤1 and
C is some positive constant. We prove the existence of ω, satisfying the minimax regret criterion and make a numerical comparison
among estimators by using the mean square error as a criterion of goodness of estimators.