Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
The Friedman-Eilber Resection Arthroplasty of the Pelvis
| |
|
Symposium: Selected Papers Presented at the 2008 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
The Friedman-Eilber Resection Arthroplasty of the Pelvis
Adam J. Schwartz1 , Piya Kiatisevi1, Fritz C. Eilber1, Frederick R. Eilber1 and Jeffrey J. Eckardt1
| (1) |
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Santa Monica, 1250 16th Street, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90404, USA |
Received: 12 December 2008 Accepted: 3 April 2009 Published online: 22 April 2009
Abstract It has been argued that internal hemipelvectomy without reconstruction of the pelvic ring leads to poor ambulation and inferior
patient acceptance. To determine the accuracy of this contention, we posed the following questions: First, how effectively
does a typical patient ambulate following this procedure? Second, what is the typical functional capacity of a patient following
internal hemipelvectomy? In the spring of 2006, we obtained video documentation of eight patients who had undergone resection
arthroplasty of the hemipelvis seen in our clinic during routine clinical followup. The minimum followup in 2006 was 1.1 years
(mean, 8.2 years; range, 1.1–22.7 years); at the time of last followup in 2008 the minimum followup was 2.9 years (mean, 9.8 years;
range, 2.9–24.5 years). At last followup seven of the eight patients were without pain, and were able to walk without supports.
The remaining patient used narcotic medication and a cane or crutch only occasionally. The mean MSTS score at the time of
most recent followup was 73.3% of normal (range 53.3–80.0%; mean raw score was 22.0; range 16–24). All eight patients ultimately
returned to gainful employment. These observations demonstrate independent painless ambulation and acceptable function is
possible following resection arthroplasty of the hemipelvis.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0844-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest,
patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations
were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study
was obtained.
References
| 1. |
Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Cannon SR, Carter SR, Sneath RS. Reconstruction of the hemipelvis after the excision of malignant tumours.
Complications and functional outcome of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:773–779.
|
| |
| 2. |
Aljassir F, Beadel GP, Turcotte RE, Griffin AM, Bell RS, Wunder JS, Isler MH. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed
with saddle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:36–41.
|
| |
| 3. |
Apffelstaedt JP, Driscoll DL, Karakousis CP. Partial and complete internal hemipelvectomy: complications and long-term follow-up.
J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181;43–48.
|
| |
| 4. |
Asavamongkolkul A, Pimolsanti R, Waikakul S, Kiatsevee P. Periacetabular limb salvage for malignant bone tumours. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13:273–279.
|
| |
| 5. |
Baliski CR, Schachar NS, McKinnon JG, Stuart GC, Temple WJ. Hemipelvectomy: a changing perspective for a rare procedure. Can J Surg. 2004;47:99–103.
|
| |
| 6. |
Beadel GP, McLaughlin CE, Wunder JS, Griffin AM, Ferguson PC, Bell RS. Outcome in two groups of patients with allograft-prosthetic
reconstruction of pelvic tumor defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:30–35.
|
| |
| 7. |
Beck LA, Einertson MJ, Winemiller MH, DePompolo RW, Hoppe KM, Sim FF. Functional outcomes and quality of life after tumor-related
hemipelvectomy. Phys Ther. 2008;88:916–927.
|
| |
| 8. |
Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, Buconjic T, McGoveran B, Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection
of stage-IIB sarcoma. Intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1663–1674.
|
| |
| 9. |
Bruns J, Luessenhop S, Behrens P. Cost analysis of three different surgical procedures for treatment of a pelvic tumour. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:359–363.
|
| |
| 10. |
Bruns J, Luessenhop SL, Dahmen G. Internal hemipelvectomy and endoprosthetic pelvic replacement: long-term follow-up results.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:27–31.
|
| |
| 11. |
Burri C, Claes L, Gerngross H, Jun RM. Total “internal” hemipelvectomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1979;94:219–226.
|
| |
| 12. |
Chang DW, Fortin AJ, Oates SD, Lewis VO. Reconstruction of the pelvic ring with vascularized double-strut fibular flap following
internal hemipelvectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1993–2000.
|
| |
| 13. |
Chretien PA, Sugarbaker PH. Surgical technique of hemipelvectomy in the lateral position. Surgery. 1981;90:900–909.
|
| |
| 14. |
Dai KR, Yan MN, Zhu ZA, Sun YH. Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:981–986.
|
| |
| 15. |
Darrach W. Partial excision of the lower shaft of the ulna for deformity following Colle’s fracture. Ann Surg. 1913;57:764–765.
|
| |
| 16. |
Delloye C, Banse X, Brichard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection
of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:579–587.
|
| |
| 17. |
Dodge LD, Johnston JO. Internal hemipelvectomy and reconstruction for malignant primary acetabular tumors. A report of five
cases. Orthopedics. 1987;10:323–327.
|
| |
| 18. |
Eilber FR, Grant TT, Sakai D, Morton DL. Internal hemipelvectomy–excision of the hemipelvis with limb preservation. An alternative
to hemipelvectomy. Cancer. 1979;43:806–809.
|
| |
| 19. |
Enneking WF, ed. Modification of the System for Functional Evaluation of the Surgical Management of Musculoskeletal Tumors. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1987.
|
| |
| 20. |
Enneking WF, Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:731–746.
|
| |
| 21. |
Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures
after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–246.
|
| |
| 22. |
Girdlestone GR. Acute pyogenic arthritis of the hip: an operation giving free access and effective drainage. Lancet. 1943;241:419–421.
|
| |
| 23. |
Hamdi M, Gebhart M, Recloux P. Internal hemipelvectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22:158–161.
|
| |
| 24. |
Hoekstra HJ, Szabo BG. Internal hemipelvectomy with intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy in the limb-sparing treatment
of a pelvic girdle chondrosarcoma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117:408–410.
|
| |
| 25. |
Hoffmann C, Gosheger G, Gebert C, Jürgens H, Winkelmann W. Functional results and quality of life after treatment of pelvic
sarcomas involving the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:575–582.
|
| |
| 26. |
Huth JF, Eckardt JJ, Pignatti G, Eilber FR. Resection of malignant bone tumors of the pelvic girdle without extremity amputation.
Arch Surg. 1988;123:1121–1124.
|
| |
| 27. |
Johnson JT. Reconstruction of the pelvic ring following tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:747–751.
|
| |
| 28. |
Karakousis CP. Internal hemipelvectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;158:279–282.
|
| |
| 29. |
Karakousis CP. Abdominoinguinal incision and other incisions in the resection of pelvic tumors. Surg Oncol. 2000;9:83–90.
|
| |
| 30. |
Karakousis CP, Emrich LJ, Driscoll DL. Variants of hemipelvectomy and their complications. Am J Surg. 1989;158:404–408.
|
| |
| 31. |
Keller WL. The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. NY Med. 1904;80:741–742.
|
| |
| 32. |
Kitagawa Y, Ek ET, Choong PF. Pelvic reconstruction using saddle prosthesis following limb salvage operation for periacetabular
tumour. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:155–162.
|
| |
| 33. |
Kocher T. Text-book of Operative Surgery. Stiles HJ, Paul CB, trans-eds. London, England: Adam and Charles Black: 1903:363.
|
| |
| 34. |
Kollender Y, Shabat S, Bickels J, Flusser G, Isakov J, Neuman Y, Cohen I, Weyl-Ben-Arush M, Ramo N, Meller I. Internal hemipelvectomy
for bone sarcomas in children and young adults: surgical considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:398–404.
|
| |
| 35. |
Linberg, BE. Interscapulo-thoracic resection for malignant tumor of the shoulder joint region. J Bone Joint Surg. 1928;10:344–349.
|
| |
| 36. |
Mumford, EB. Acromioclavicular dislocation: a new operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1941;23:799–802.
|
| |
| 37. |
Nielsen HK, Veth RP, Oldhoff J, Koops HS, Scales JT. Resection of a peri-acetabular chondrosarcoma and reconstruction of the
pelvis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:413–415.
|
| |
| 38. |
Nilsonne U, Kreicbergs A, Olsson E, Stark A. Function after pelvic tumour resection involving the acetabular ring. Int Orthop. 1982;6:27–33.
|
| |
| 39. |
Pant R, Moreau P, Ilyas I, Paramasivan ON, Younge D. Pelvic limb-salvage surgery for malignant tumors. Int Orthop. 2001;24:311–315.
|
| |
| 40. |
Patel MV, Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR. Resection arthroplasty of the hip—internal hemipelvectomy for malignant tumors of the pelvis:
Perioperative management, operative technique, and functional outcome. Semin Arthroplasty. 1999;10:163–170.
|
| |
| 41. |
Renard AJ, Veth RP, Schreuder HW, Pruszczynski M, Keller A, van Hoesel Q, Bökkerink JP. The saddle prosthesis in pelvic primary
and secondary musculoskeletal tumors: functional results at several postoperative intervals. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:188–194.
|
| |
| 42. |
Stamm, TT. Excision of the proximal row of the carpus. Proc R Soc Med. 1944; 38:74–75.
|
| |
| 43. |
Steel HH. Partial or complete resection of the hemipelvis. An alternative to hindquarter amputation for periacetabular chondrosarcoma
of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:719–730.
|
| |
| 44. |
Tunn PU, Fehlberg S, Andreou D, Kettelhack C. Endoprosthesis in the operative treatment of bone tumours of the pelvis [in
German]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007;145:753–759.
|
| |
| 45. |
Wirbel RJ, Schulte M, Maier B, Koschnik M, Mutschler WE. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: oncologic and functional outcome. Sarcoma. 2000;4:161–168.
|
| |
| 46. |
Wirbel RJ, Schulte M, Mutschler WE. Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcomas: oncologic and functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;390:190–220.
|
| |
Supplemental Material
|
|
|
|
|
|