Welcome!
To use the personalized features of this site, please log in or register.
If you have forgotten your username or password, we can help.
|
 |
Toward Drawing an Atlas of Hypothesis Classes: Approximating a Hypothesis via Another Hypothesis Model
| Book Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin / Heidelberg |
| ISSN | 0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online) |
| Volume | Volume 2534/2002 |
| Book | Discovery Science |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-36182-0 |
| Copyright | 2002 |
| ISBN | 978-3-540-00188-1 |
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-36182-0_20 |
| Pages | 47-92 |
| Subject Collection | Computer Science |
| SpringerLink Date | Tuesday, January 01, 2002 |
| |
|
Toward Drawing an Atlas of Hypothesis Classes: Approximating a Hypothesis via Another Hypothesis Model
Osamu Maruyama7 , Takayoshi Shoudai8 and Satoru Miyano9, 10 
| (7) |
Faculty of Mathematics, Kyushu University, Japan |
| (8) |
Department of Informatics, Kyushu University, Japan |
| (9) |
Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Japan |
| (10) |
Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Japan |
Abstract
Computational knowledge discovery can be considered to be a complicated human activity concerned with searching for something
new from data with computer systems. The optimization of theentire process of computational knowledge discovery is a big challenge in computer science. If we had an atlas of hypothesis classes
which describes prior and basic knowledge on relative relationship between the hypothesis classes, it would be helpful in
selecting hypothesis classes to be searched in discovery processes. In this paper, to give a foundation for an atlas of various
classes of hypotheses, we have defined a measure of approximation of a hypothesis class C
1 to another class C
2. The hypotheses we consider here are restricted to m-ary Boolean functions. For 0 ≤ ∈ ≤ 1, we say that C
1 is (1-∈)-approximated to C
2 if, for every distribution Dover (0, 1)m, and for each hypothesis h
1 ∈ C
1, there exists a hypothesis h
2 ∈ C
2 such that, with the probability at most ∈, we have h
1
x) ≠ h
2
x) where x ∈ { 0, 1 } m is drawn randomly and independently according to D. Thus, we can use the
approximation ratio of C
1 to C
2 as an index of how similar C
1 is to C
2. We discuss lower bounds of the approximation ratios among representative classes of hypotheses like decision lists, decision
trees, linear discriminant functions and so on. This prior knowledge would come in useful when selecting hypothesis classes
in the initial stage and the sequential stages involved in the entire discovery process.
Fulltext Preview (Small, Large)
 References secured to subscribers.
|
|
|
|
|
|